Legal Opinion
Sanchez v. H & R Maintenance, L.C.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided October 21, 2013No. 13-20973-CivPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NECESSARY PARTIES
MARCIA G. COOKE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before me upon Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiffs Amended Complaint to Add Necessary Parties (“Motion for Leave to Amend”) (ECF No. 28). Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiffs Untimely Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiffs Amended Complaint to Add Necessary Parties (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff did not reply to Defendants’ response in opposition, and the time to do so has expired. Therefore Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- George v. Smith v. School Board of Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Sosa v. Airprint Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Lord v. Fairway Electric Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exel Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Alfonza McKeever v. Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aligned Bayshore Holdings, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Cole-Parmer Instrument Company LLC v. Professional Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
- ConSeal International Incorporated v. Neogen CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020