Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1955 Ford Convertible
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1956No. 92 of 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This suit was instituted through the filing of a libel by the United States of America for the forfeiture of a certain 1955 Ford Convertible under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 781 and 782. Mary Bonavitacola, the registered owner of the car,1 and the Broad Street Trust Company, the holder of a security interest,2 have both filed claims. The trial was held on December 20, 1955. John •Bonavitacola, son of Mary Bonavitacola, was in court with his mother throughout the entire trial, but did not take the stand to refute the testimony of the two Philadelphia police…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. One 1949 Pontiac SedanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Pacific Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- United States v. One 1948 Cadillac Convertible CoupeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. One 1961 Cadillac, General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Audrey Bride, , United States of America v. Madeline DefalcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Fell v. ArmourDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
- United States v. One 1967 Cadillac Coupe Eldorado, Motor No. H7185812, License No. Tvg 691, Its Tools and AppurtenancesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- ONE 1973 CADILLAC, ETC. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.