Legal Opinion
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 2, 1932No. 574PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
The facts stated in the certificate are these:
“ The record presents four consolidated automobile forfeiture cases in which the same disputed legal questions are involved.
“ On four different dates during July and August, 1930, the four automobiles whose forfeiture is in issue were seized at ports of entry on the Mexican border, each vehicle having liquor concealed therein. Three of the cars were seized at San Ysidro, California, and the fourth at Calexico, California. Each car was observed crossing the international boundary line from Mexico and traveling some distance thereafter in the United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Maul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jeanette Randolph v. Imbs, Inc., Cheryl Alexander v. Unlimited Progress Corp., Cross-Appellee. Jennifer J. Cross v. Risk Management Alternatives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Lowden v. Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. One 1976 Mercedes Benz 280S, Serial No. 11602012072193Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.