Legal Opinion
Grant v. May Department Stores Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 2001No. 00-CV-1493PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
Alyson D. Grant (Grant) contends that the trial court committed error by granting May Department Store’s (Hecht’s) motion for summary judgment dismissing her claims for denial of reasonable accommodations due to a disability and retaliation, both alleged to be in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA). We affirm in part, and reverse in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Facts
In October 1996, Grant began working for Hecht’s at Metro Center. Initially she worked in the cosmetic department as a “floater,” where she would substitute for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Arthur Manoharan, M.D. v. Columbia University College of Physicians & SurgeonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Moses Passer v. American Chemical SocietyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Wright v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Giles v. Transit Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Dickerson v. SecTek, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Washington Investment Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Securities HouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Teru Chang v. Institute for Public-Private Partnerships, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.