Legal Opinion
Springston v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 5, 1994No. 3:93 CV 7233PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the motion of defendant General Motors Corporation, Electro-Motive Division (“General Motors”) summary judgment, and the motion of defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff opposes both motions, and both Conrail and General Motors have filed reply briefs. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a collision between a car and a train at a railroad crossing in northwestern Ohio, south of Bowling Green. The driver…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lorincie v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Viad Corp. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Carter v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Oglesby v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Dillon v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996