Legal Opinion
Lorincie v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 1998No. Civil Action 95-7107PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge.
On January 5, 1998, defendant Coach & Car Equipment Co. [“Coach & Car”] filed a Motion for Summary Judgment for the claims brought against it by plaintiffs Charles and Ellen Lorincie for injuries allegedly suffered by Mr. Lorincie while attempting to operate a Coach & Car engineer’s cab seat in the train in which he worked. Mr. Lorincie, who alleges that he was injured while seeking to move the seat from its upright to its closed position, states that he has suffered severe back injuries and is permanently disabled. The Lorincies claim that the seat was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- John M. Oglesby and Lois P. Oglesby v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Company, General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Wright v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
- Roth v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2001
- Gordon v. Maryland State PoliceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.