Legal Opinion

Viad Corp. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1997No. B108343PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

Real parties Jake Allison and 109 other individuals (hereinafter referred to as real parties) filed a personal injury and wrongful death lawsuit against petitioner Viad Corp. (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) for damages resulting from their exposure to asbestos insulation contained on locomotives. Petitioner moved for summary judgment on the grounds, inter alia, that real parties’ state law tort claims were preempted by federal law, specifically the Locomotive Boiler Inspection Act (hereinafter referred to as the BIA, formerly 45 U.S.C. §§ 22-34, now recodified in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Darby v. A-Best Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Scheiding v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lorincie v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Monarch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Scheiding v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API