DeGarmo v. Goldman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
19 Cal.2d 755 (1942)
G. C. DeGARMO, Respondent,
v.
A. GOLDMAN et al., Appellants.
L. A. No. 17346.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Mar. 5, 1942.
Frank M. Gunter for Appellant Shenberg.
O. C. Sattinger for Appellant Golden State Glass Corporation.
Newby & Newby and Mitchell, Silberberg, Roth & Knupp for Appellant Goldman.
Glen Behymer and Biby & Biby for Respondent.
EDMONDS, J.
The controversy between the parties to this litigation concerns the affairs of the Golden State Glass Corporation. G. C. DeGarmo, one of its stockholders, and also a director, under the authority of section 310 of the Civil…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.