Legal Opinion

DeGarmo v. Goldman

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1942No. L. A. 17346Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 Cal.2d 755 (1942)

G. C. DeGARMO, Respondent,

v.

A. GOLDMAN et al., Appellants.

L. A. No. 17346.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 5, 1942.

Frank M. Gunter for Appellant Shenberg.

O. C. Sattinger for Appellant Golden State Glass Corporation.

Newby & Newby and Mitchell, Silberberg, Roth & Knupp for Appellant Goldman.

Glen Behymer and Biby & Biby for Respondent.

EDMONDS, J.

The controversy between the parties to this litigation concerns the affairs of the Golden State Glass Corporation. G. C. DeGarmo, one of its stockholders, and also a director, under the authority of section 310 of the Civil…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API