Legal Opinion
Grant Paper Box Co. v. Russell Box Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 17, 1946No. 4044PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
After our opinion in this case was handed down the plaintiff-appellant petitioned for rehearing on the principal ground that we had erred in holding claim 3 of the Dreymann patent invalid for lack of invention on the authority of Sinclair & Carroll Co., Inc., v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 S.Ct. 1143. We invited written arguments on the petition and after considering them granted it. Now, the point having been briefed and argued, we think it well made.
The patentee in the Sinclair case, Gessler, did not discover what characteristics a solvent for a printing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Russell Box Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Halliburton Company v. The Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.