Legal Opinion
Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 20, 1933No. 9613PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The parties will be referred to as in the court below; the appellant as plaintiff, and the appellee as defendant. The suit is for infringement of letters patent No. 1,379',855, granted to the plaintiff May 31, 1921, upon an -application filed March 3, 1923, for a cream depilatory. The defenses are lack of invention, vagueness of description, and non-infringement. From the decree dismissing his complaint, the plaintiff appeals.
This patent was sustained by Judge Lindley in the case of Donner v. Walgreen Co. and Neet, Inc. (D. C. N. D. Ill.) 44 F.(2d) 637. It appears that…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- The International Glass Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Sbicca-Del Mac, Inc. v. Milius Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.