Legal Opinion
Mansfield v. Hyde
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1952No. Civ. 18921PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff and cross-defendant from a judgment for defendant and cross-complainant on her cross-complaint in an action for money. Since there is no appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial (Code Civ. Proc., § 963), the appeal therefrom will be dismissed.
On May 3, 1949, plaintiff, the maternal grandmother, Betsy Mansfield Lovett, the mother, and Herman W. Lovett, the stepfather, of Jay Mansfield Lovett, a minor aged 7%, entered into a written agreement with defendant whereby she was given the sole and exclusive care of the minor free from all interference by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. CopplaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Wood v. KreppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Abstract Investment Co. v. HutchinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Stanley v. American Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of Boy Scouts of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.