Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Coppla

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1950No. Crim. 4523PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.

Coppla and one Rochlin were charged in count one of an information with having violated Penal Code section 337a, subdivision 3, in that they did hold certain memo*767randa and papers which represented and referred to moneys bet on the result of horse races, and in count two with having violated Penal Code section 337a, subdivision 1, in that they did engage in pool selling and bookmaking on the result of a horse race. Both counts were based on the same facts. The court, without a jury, found Coppla not guilty of the offense charged in count one and guilty of the offense charged in count two.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. ToledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. ZoffelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. GrecoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. FreudenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Mansfield v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Finster v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API