Abstract Investment Co. v. Hutchinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.
Should the court receive evidence on a tenant’s affirmative defense that his tenancy is being terminated solely because of his race ?
This is the question posed in this proceeding in unlawful detainer in the Municipal Court, Santa Anita Judicial District. The plaintiff, Abstract Investment Co., instituted the action for the purpose of obtaining possession of certain premises leased to defendant under a month-to-month tenancy. Defendant’s answer acknowledged, in effect, that a proper notice to quit had been served and that plaintiff was entitled to possession except for the facts alleged in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Mulkey v. ReitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.