Legal Opinion

City Cab, Carriage & Transfer Co. v. Hayden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1913No. 10481PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Pendergast, J., entered May 20, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, who was plaintiff below, brought this action against the appellants to enjoin them from enforcing certain rules and regulations promulgated by the respondent Hayden, as commissioner of public safety of the city of Spokane, intended for the regulation and control of hacks, omnibuses, and other vehicles, and persons in charge of the same, while attending upon the arrival of trains at the *25depot of the Northern Pacific Railway Company in that city. The respondent had a decree in the court below, and this appeal is prosecuted therefrom.

The tracks of the Northern Pacific Railway…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Veneman v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ingersoll v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Commonwealth v. MatthewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Carl v. West Aberdeen Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Huntworth v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Mader v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. McGuire v. WilkersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API