Ingersoll v. Rousseau
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered April 3, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury, perpetually enjoining a nuisance.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, C. J.
This action was brought by the respondents, who were plaintiffs below, to enjoin the appellant from maintaining, or permitting to be maintained, houses of ill fame on certain real property owned by him, situated in the city of Everett. The trial was had before the court without a jury, and resulted in a permanent injunction against the appellant.
The trial court found, in substance, that the respondents and appellant owned lots in the city of Everett lying adjacent to each other; that the respondents used their lots as places of residence for themselves and their families, while the appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Cranford v. . Tyrrell.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hamilton v. WhitridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Carl v. West Aberdeen Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Weakley v. PageTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Sholin v. Skamania Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.