Legal Opinion

Wilburn v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 7, 2011No. 11-320 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge:

In this action, styled a “Petition for Injunc-tive Relief to Stop Administrative Offset From Being Taken From Federal Government Retirement Annuity,” Plaintiff Anne Marie Wilburn, acting pro se, seeks to bar the federal government from the continued collection on Plaintiffs overdue federal student loans via an offset to her monthly government annuity. As grounds for injunctive relief, she alleges violations of her Fifth Amendment rights to equal protection and due process, violation of the notice requirements of the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, 31 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greene v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Ojo v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  3. San Antonio Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API