Legal Opinion
Macy v. City of Fontana
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 2016No. D068508PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
In 2011, the Legislature adopted legislation, which as of June 29, 2011, dissolved the redevelopment agencies (RA’s) that had been formed by municipalities throughout the state under the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, 1 § 33000 et seq.; hereafter CRL). (See § 34170; see also Assem. Bill No. 26 (2011-2012 1st Ex. Sess.); hereafter Assembly Bill 26.) Before their dissolution, the operations of RA’s were funded by way of so-called “tax increment” financing.
Assembly Bill 26 provided a fairly detailed scheme for winding down the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- County of Solano v. Vallejo Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Starr v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of Galt v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Cam-Carson, LLC v. Carson Reclamation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.