Legal Opinion
City of Galt v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 2, 2017No. C075897PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, Acting P.J.
*370After Governor Brown announced his intention to dissolve redevelopment agencies, but before the legislation passed, City of Galt entered into an agreement (the Cooperative Agreement) with its former redevelopment agency under which the former redevelopment agency agreed to finance several parts of the redevelopment plan, totaling more than *371$22,000,000. To obtain money for the financing, the former redevelopment agency issued tax allocation bonds, which were to be repaid using tax increment revenue. With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies discussed but still not signed into law, City of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Brentwood v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Anaheim v. BoslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- City of Anaheim v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Anaheim v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- City of Anaheim v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.