Legal Opinion

W. T. Grant Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 7, 1949No. C. D. 1191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

In the instant case, the plaintiff seeks to recover duties alleged to have been erroneously assessed upon an importation of cotton gloves. The merchandise in issue, listed on the invoice-under call No. 39322, Mfg. No. 7424%, case Nos. 5762 and 5763,. and described therein as “Ladies’ Cotton Fabric Gloves,” was assessed with duty at the rate of 60 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 915 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as gloves made-of fabric knit on a warp-knitting machine. The additional duty provided for in paragraph 924 of said act was also assessed but is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Greely v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. United States v. Ocean Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  4. United States v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sol Kahaner & Bro. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API