Legal Opinion

United States v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 17, 1912No. 511PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Board of United'States-General Appraisers, Abstract 24002 (T. D. 30944).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case is thymol, a chemical compound, entered at the port of New York on the 28th day of October, 1909. .Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 55 cents per pound under paragraph 3 of the tariff act of August 5,1909, as a chemical compound in the preparation of which alcohol had been used.

*11The importers duly protested, claiming the thymol was dutiable under the same paragraph at 25 per cent ad valorem as a chemical compound in the preparation of which alcohol was not used, and this -was the sole question .tried before the Board of General Appraisers. The United States…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Stegeman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nevin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. Ocean Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  3. Sol Kahaner & Bro. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. United States v. Hercules AntiquesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. W. T. Grant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API