Legal Opinion

Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 25, 1942No. C. D. 596PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dallinger, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States, arising at the port of San Francsico, brought to recover certain customs ■duties alleged to have been improperly exacted on a particular importation described in the invoice as “Barrel Bolts, Iron Black Japd.” Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as articles or wares not specially provided for, composed in chief value of base metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer.

It is claimed tha.t said articles are properly dutiable at 1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. United States v. Lahey & DunoanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. W. T. Grant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  3. North American Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Protest 788513-G of Peck & Mack Co.United States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API