Legal Opinion

City of Columbia v. Putnam

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1962No. 17970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of violating the Business and Professional License Ordinance of the City of Columbia.

Appellant is State Manager of Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company which maintains an office in Columbia. He was charged with failure to pay for and procure a business license for said Company. It is admitted that no such license was applied for and that no license fee has been paid by said company.

Appellant contends that the ordinance is discriminatory, arbitrary and unreasonable (as applied to his Company) in that there is no maximum amount imposed by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Charleston Heights Co. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Cowart v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Hill v. Council of AbbevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. Glens Falls Insurance v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Carter v. LinderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. City of Columbia v. PutnamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API