Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of Spartanburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 20, 1933No. 13673PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice BeEasE.

Each of the respondents operates a group of retail grocery stores in the City of Spartanburg; the first operating six stores and the second seven. Each paid the business license tax imposed by a certain ordinance of the city under protest, and within the statutory time brought suit to recover the amount paid, on the ground of the alleged invalidity of those sections of the ordinance under which they were taxed.

The demurrers of the City of Spartanburg to the complaints were overruled by orders of Circuit Judge Sease, and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Carroll v. Town of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  4. Charleston Heights Co. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Cowart v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Kentucky Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Hurt v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Daniel v. John P. Nutt Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API