Legal Opinion

City of Columbia v. Putnam

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1962No. 17970Published

1Opinion of the Court

241 S.C. 195 (1962)

127 S.E.2d 631

The CITY OF COLUMBIA, Respondent,

v.

Roy PUTNAM, Appellant.

17970

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

October 4, 1962.

Messrs. Roberts, Jennings, Thomas & Lumpkin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Messrs. John W. Sholenberger, City Attorney, and Edward A. Harter, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Messrs. Roberts, Jennings, Thomas & Lumpkin, of Columbia, for Appellant, in Reply.

October 4, 1962.

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of violating the Business and Professional License Ordinance of the City of Columbia.

Appellant is State Manager of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Greenville Baseball, Inc. v. Bearden, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Charleston Heights Co. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Cowart v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Hill v. Council of AbbevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API