Donovan Construction Co. v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentAllen, P.J.
I believe that this cause should be remanded to the circuit court for a determination of whether the Commissioner of Revenue properly exercised the discretion given him under § 335 to disallow the amended combined returns. In all other respects I agree with the majority opinion. The majority decline to remand on grounds that at the trial court the department admitted the Donovan Construction Group was a unitary business and was entitled and required to file its tax returns on a combined basis.
I believe the majority read too much into the Attorney General’s admission on the motion for summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- FW Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Dept. of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Morris v. RadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Clarke-Gravely Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.