Legal Opinion
Prima TEK II, L.L.C. v. Polypap, S.A.R.L.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 22, 2005No. Nos. 04-1411, 04-1421PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Polypap, S.A.R.L., Philippe Charrin, and Andre Charrin (collectively “Polypap”) appeal from the judgment of the district court holding claim 15 of United States Patent No. 5,410,856 (the “’856 patent”) and claim 9 of United States Patent No. 5,615,532 (the “’532 patent”) not invalid and infringed by Polypap, and enjoining Polypap from further infringement by making, using, or selling the accused device, or instructing others in its use. Pri-ma Tek II, L.L.C. v. Polypap Sarl, 316 F.Supp.2d 693 (S.D.III.2004). Prima Tek II, L.L.C. and Southpac Trust International, Inc., as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Golden Blount, Inc. v. Robert H. Peterson Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ipxl Holdings, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Commil USA, Llc v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Nextec Applications v. BROOKWOOD COMPANIES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- On Track Innovations Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.