Legal Opinion
Commil USA, Llc v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 25, 2013No. 2012-1042PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
*1364Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Cisco Systems, Inc. appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, which was based on the findings of two separate jury verdicts finding that: Cisco directly and indirectly infringed specified claims of Commil USA, LLC’s U.S. Patent No. 6,430,395 (“'395 patent”); the specified claims of the '395 patent are not…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Commil United States, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Info-Hold, Inc. v. Muzak LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/SDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.