Legal Opinion
O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 9, 2006No. C 00-4071CW(EDL), C 01-3995 DWPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 02 MICRO’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT AND RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; DENYING MPS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; AND DENYING IN PART AND CONDITIONALLY GRANTING IN PART MPS’ MOTIONS FOR A NEW TRIAL
WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 02 Micro International Limited and Counterde-fendant 02 Micro, Inc. (collectively, 02 Micro) move to amend the November 10, 2005 Judgment to include prejudgment interest and to declare that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,144,814 (the ’814 patent) and 6,316,881 (the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
- De Lage Landen Operational Services, LLC v. Third Pillar Systems, IncDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. WynneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.