Legal Opinion

Rodewald v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 2011No. A10-1790Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge.*

Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate a default judgment establishing custody, parenting time, and child support, contending that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction due to ineffective service of process because respondent commenced the action by motion pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518.156, subd. 1(2). We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Shawn Michael Taylor (father) and respondent Corey Elizabeth Rodewald (mother) are the unmarried parents of a minor child. Father’s paternity was determined by private genetic testing, and fa*731ther and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Custody of the Child of Williams v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API