Legal Opinion

State v. Al-Naseer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 2007No. A05-1394PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

The issue before us involves the mens rea element of the crime of criminal vehicular homicide for leaving the scene of an accident that caused the death of a human being. The district court found respondent Mohammad G. Al-Naseer guilty of the crime based on the finding that Al-Naseer knew that he had been involved in an accident. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the mens rea element required that the state prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the driver “knew or had reason to know that the accident caused bodily injury to or death of a person.” State v.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. People v. DigirolamoIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. VelaWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Micinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. PakhnyukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  4. Beardsley v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. State v. NdikumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API