Custody of the Child of Williams v. Carlson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
The district court adjudicated respondent as the father of the parties’ child and awarded him sole physical custody. On appeal, the mother argues: (1) the genetic testing showing that respondent was not the father of the child rebuts any presumption raised by the parties’ signing of a recognition of parentage; (2) the record does not support the court’s findings on the best interests factors; and (3) the court committed reversible error in denying her motion for new trial, when the test results were not known until after trial.
While we agree that the district court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Witso v. OverbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- J. T. S. v. S. L. v. B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Rodewald v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011