Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Krantz

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1947No. 15786PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the plaintiff in error insist that the general demurrer should have been sustained because the petition for specific performance of the agreement to execute a lease was prematurely brought on June 21, 1946, since the lease was not to commence until August 5, 1946, and that the plaintiff in error would have had the right to change his mind up to the time when the lease was to become operative. Gilleland v. Welch, 199 Ga. 341 (34 S. E. 2d, 517), is cited in support of this contention. In that ease, involving specific performance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. CagleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Fraser v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. F. & W. Grand Five-Ten-Twenty-Five Cent Stores Inc. v. EisemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Groover v. BrandonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Funk v. Browne & LeacySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mike Doll, Ronald Elbon and Kent Langworthy v. Grand Union CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Burnam v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Ehrlich v. TeagueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Friedsam v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API