Ehrlich v. Teague
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
The petition of the lessee, in so far as it seeks injunctive relief against the lessors’ instituting dispossessory proceedings, does not state a cause of action, for the reason that the lessee has an adequate remedy at law; and if, as he contends here, there has not been a forfeiture of the lease by his failure to pay or tender the monthly rental, such fact would constitute a good defense to a dispossessory proceeding. If the petition states a cause of action, it must be upon other grounds, such as (1) to prevent a multiplicity of suits or irreparable injury; or (2) to compel…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hamby & Toomer v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Ford & Co. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Candler v. SmythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Citizens Oil Company Inc. v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Gilleland v. WelchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scruggs v. PurvisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Kirkland v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Kingsdale Apartments, Inc. v. Board of Lights & WaterworksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Lee v. PeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.