Legal Opinion
Burnam v. Wilkerson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 9, 1962No. 21496PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
The defendants, Henry and Bessie Bumam, plaintiffs in error here, insist that, notwithstanding Code Ann. § 110-1208 (Ga. L. 1959, pp. 234, 236) explicitly denying the right of appeal to a judgment overruling a motion for summary judgment, this court should consider the exception taken in their bill to the judgment overruling their motion for such relief made in this case.
The act of 1957 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 230) embodied in Code Ann. § 6-701 contains the provision: “Where bill of exceptions is permissible, all judgments, rulings, or orders rendered in the case which are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Williams v. Manchester Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Board of Tax-Assessors v. CatledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Fraser v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Lamar v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lloyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Moulder v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Undercofler v. Grantham Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- English v. MullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.