Legal Opinion

Friedsam v. Underwood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1960No. 21000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

1. “Where a contract for the lease of real estate is in writing, signed by both parties, is certain and fair, is for an adequate consideration, and capable of being performed, a court of equity, as a matter of course, will decree its specific performance.” F. & W. Grand &c. Stores v. Eiseman, 160 Ga. 321 (7) (127 S. E. 872); Kaplan v. Krantz, 202 Ga. 194, 197 (42 S. E. 2d 371); Whiteway Neon-Ad, Inc. v. Maddox, 211 Ga. 27, 32 (83 S. E. 2d 676). The fact that the plaintiff had been in possession of the leased premises for a little more than a year before he was ousted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. F. & W. Grand Five-Ten-Twenty-Five Cent Stores Inc. v. EisemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Black v. Milner Hotels Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Turman v. SmarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Sikes v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Kaplan v. KrantzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trio Mobile Homes, Inc. v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API