Legal Opinion

Parker v. Vanell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1992No. CV-90-0445-PRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

This case requires us to construe for the first time the phrase “common liability” as used in various provisions of Arizona’s Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (UCATA), A.R.S. §§ 12-2501 to -2509. Because this is an issue of first impression, and because UCATA’s significance continues to increase as more and more cases are filed alleging multiple theories of liability against multiple defendants, we granted review. See rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

Factual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Holtz v. HolderArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. City of Tucson v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Parker v. VanellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. PAM TRANSPORT v. Freightliner Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Brodsky v. Phoenix P.D. Ret. Sys. Bd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Salt River Project/Bechtel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Pelletier v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API