Parker v. Vanell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Judge.
In this decision we hold that pursuant to the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (UCATA), A.R.S. §§ 12-2501 to 2509, the amount paid by one tortfeasor as consideration for the execution by the injured party of a full settlement and release of all tortfeasors is the only amount in controversy between the tortfeasors in an action for contribution, absent any claim of unreasonableness, fraud or bad faith.
We reverse the judgment of the trial court based upon its erroneous conclusion of law that in an action for contribution, the common liability and amount in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mallaney v. DunawayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, Ex Rel. Club Exchange Corp. v. Farmers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Miller v. JarrellColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dutsch v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Parker v. VanellArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Dutsch v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Parker v. VanellArizona Supreme Court · 1992