Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1990No. CV-89-0236-PRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an action in which one joint tortfeasor seeks contribution from another for amounts paid to the injured party. See A.R.S. § 12-2501 et seq. We granted review to determine whether a non-settling tortfeasor is bound by the amount of damages that the settling tortfeasors paid in “good faith” to obtain the injured parties’ complete release of all defendants. See Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTS

This case arises from an automobile accident and resulting actions for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dompeling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. Advance MacHine Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Mozes v. DaruCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. MacKey v. IrisariWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API