Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. Phoenix P.D. Ret. Sys. Bd.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 8, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 94-0030PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Presiding Judge.

Fred Brodsky (appellant) appeals from a judgment affirming the Phoenix Police System Retirement Board’s (the Board) denial of his request for a temporary disability pension. The primary issue on appeal is whether appellant was offered an assignment that would enable him to perform a “reasonable range of duties” in the police department for purposes of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 38-842.27. Because we find that the offered assignment fell within a reasonable range of duties of a police officer and substantial evidence supported the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Martin v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Inzunza-Ortega v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Raven Rock Construction, L.L.C. v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Anderson v. Arizona Game & Fish DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API