Brodsky v. Phoenix P.D. Ret. Sys. Bd.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Presiding Judge.
Fred Brodsky (appellant) appeals from a judgment affirming the Phoenix Police System Retirement Board’s (the Board) denial of his request for a temporary disability pension. The primary issue on appeal is whether appellant was offered an assignment that would enable him to perform a “reasonable range of duties” in the police department for purposes of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 38-842.27. Because we find that the offered assignment fell within a reasonable range of duties of a police officer and substantial evidence supported the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Martin v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Inzunza-Ortega v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Raven Rock Construction, L.L.C. v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Anderson v. Arizona Game & Fish DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.