Legal Opinion

State v. Dawson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1972No. 36PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

Defendants’ assignments of error based on exceptions to the denial of their motions for severance are without merit. Defendants were jointly indicted in a single bill for the rape of Mrs. Edell Hughes on July 18, 1971. The evidence upon which the State relied for the conviction of each relates to a single transaction and involves all defendants.

The record does not disclose what reason, if any, was advanced in the trial court in support of the motions for severance. In this Court, Smith and Roseboro assert that they were prejudiced by their trial with Dawson because the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. HamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. AycothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API