State v. Ham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
The defendants assign as error the refusal of the court below to sustain their demurrer to the evidence under G.S. 15-173. However, the assignment is abandoned as to all the defendants other than Leonard Teaster. They, no doubt, upon reflection, perceived that the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the State, tends to show that they, acting in concert, made an assault with deadly weapons upon the deceased and her companions, and that in the course of the assault the deceased was killed. Their own testimony tends to show there was a “free-for-all” affray during which Mrs.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. SwaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.