Legal Opinion

State v. Bryant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1972No. 89PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The State’s evidence discloses ample support for every essential element of the capital offense charged in the indictment. The defendant as a witness for himself corroborates all essential elements of the offense except the use of force. Although he claimed the prosecuting witness consented, even so, he admitted when he approached her automobile he had an open knife in his pocket, “. . . (B)ecause I didn’t know what I was liable to run into when I got in the car.” The evidence required its submission to the jury on the capital felony charged. State v. Shutt, 279 N.C. 689, 185…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API