Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Beaudry v. Panosian

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1967PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

We deem the controlling issue to be:

Were the petition for writ of prohibition and other proofs sufficient to support the issuance of the writ?

The petitioner relies upon three statutes which are as follows:

“301.39 First adjournment when parties appear. At the time of the return of the process or of joining issue without process the justice may adjourn the action not exceeding 3 days and shall, upon application of either party, adjourn it for such time as may be requested, not exceeding one week; but if sufficient cause is shown on oath by either party the justice shall grant an adjournment for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State Ex Rel. Gaynon v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Drugsvold v. Small Claims Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In re Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Circuit Court for Racine CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. Imposition of Sanctions in Alt v. ClineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Instruction v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Prentice v. County Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API