Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Beaudry v. Panosian
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1967PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
We deem the controlling issue to be:
Were the petition for writ of prohibition and other proofs sufficient to support the issuance of the writ?
The petitioner relies upon three statutes which are as follows:
“301.39 First adjournment when parties appear. At the time of the return of the process or of joining issue without process the justice may adjourn the action not exceeding 3 days and shall, upon application of either party, adjourn it for such time as may be requested, not exceeding one week; but if sufficient cause is shown on oath by either party the justice shall grant an adjournment for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Gaynon v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Drugsvold v. Small Claims Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- In re Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Circuit Court for Racine CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Imposition of Sanctions in Alt v. ClineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Department of Public Instruction v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Prentice v. County Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.