Legal Opinion

Imposition of Sanctions in Alt v. Cline

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1999No. 96-3356, 96-3588, 98-0029-W]PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 1. Ernesto L. Acosta, M.D. and his attorney, George Burnett, appeal a decision of the court of appeals requiring Dr. Acosta *79to answer a certain question posed to him at a deposition and affirming sanctions on Burnett for instructing Dr. Acosta not to answer it. Burnett claims that the question posed required the expert opinion of Dr. Acosta and that Dr. Acosta, although an expert, was not required to answer it. He argues that the sanctions were an erroneous exercise of the circuit court's discretion because he was substantially justified in directing his client not to answer. We agree.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Nancy Deitchman, Paula Renfroe, and Dr. Arthur L. Herbst, Witness-Appellee v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cramer v. Theda Clark Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People Ex Rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v. ThorpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Two Unnamed v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Carney-Hayes Ex Rel. McCormack v. Northwest Wisconsin Home Care, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lassa v. RongstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API