Legal Opinion
James Talcott, Inc. v. Finley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 3, 1964No. 40199PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This action was commenced by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendant below, to recover judgment for replevin and possession of 8,000 Chemell-Demlerchix chickens, or, in lieu thereof, judgment for their value in the sum of $3,749.40. The action was predicated upon a title retention note and contract entered into on April 20, 1959, between the defendant (buyer) and Chemell, Inc. (seller), and on May 12, 1959, sold and assigned by Chemell, Inc. to plaintiff. The defendant answered and alleged that the chickens were not as represented, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Steward v. Commonwealth Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cedar Rapids Nat. Bank v. BasharaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- First State Bank of Oklahoma City v. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Miller v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Steiger v. Commerce Acceptance of Oklahoma City, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Williams Petroleum Company, a Partnership Composed of William H. Clement and H. C. Preston, Jr. v. Midland Cooperatives, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- P.E.A.C.E. Corp. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Scrivner v. Sonat Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Globalrock Networks, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.