Legal Opinion

State v. Emery

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 13, 1918No. 8812PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from County Court, Washita County; L. R. Shean, Judge. Action by the State of Oklahoma against W. A. Emery. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, O.

In February, 1915, the banking department of the state of Oklahoma took charge of the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank of Mountain View, Okla., and thereby acquired the assets of -the bank, among which were the two notes involved in this action. Thereafter the state of Oklahoma instituted a Shit 'upon said notes against W. Á. Emery in the county court of Washita county. “Exhibit A” is a note for the sum of $550 of date April 18, 1914, and due December 1. 1914, bearing interest at 10 per cent, per annum from maturity until paid, signed by W. A. Emery and payable to one T. E.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. A. Morrison & Co. v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. Citizens' Savings Bank of Columbus v. LandisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Corcoran v. Snow Cattle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cashion v. Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. C. L. McMahon Jr. v. Caribbean Mills, Inc., a Haitian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Sanley v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Mothersead v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Sharp v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API