Legal Opinion

City State Bank of Hobart v. Pickard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1912No. 2079PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Brror fronn District Court, Kiowa County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the City State Bank of Hobart against H. G. Pickard. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

TURNER, C.. J.

On January 25, 1909, the City State Bank of Hobart, plaintiff in error, in the district court of Kiowa county, sued, in the first count, H. G. Pickard, one of the defendants in error, on a promissory note for $185, dated April 11, 1908, whereby defendant-promised to pay to the order of Earl Davidson that amount, with interest, on December 1, 1908, and which said note had been indorsed by him- to plaintiff for value and before maturity. In the second count plaintiff sued Earl Davidson as indorser, and in the third count both Pickard and Davidson as maker and indorser thereof,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Tovera v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lambert v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Foster v. Augustanna College & Theological SeminarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. C. L. McMahon Jr. v. Caribbean Mills, Inc., a Haitian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Conqueror Trust Co. v. SimmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Sharp v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API