Legal Opinion

Howard v. Sasso

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1960No. 174PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Process may be served upon a nonresident in the manner prescribed by G.S. 1-105 in any action against him “growing out of any accident or collision in which said nonresident may be involved by reason of the operation by him, for him, or under his control or direction, express or implied, of a motor vehicle on such public highway of this State, or at any other place in this State.”

Finding of fact #3 is conclusive on appeal if supported by compe tent evidence. Ewing v. Thompson, 233 N.C. 564, 65 S.E. 2d 17, and cases cited; Hart v. Coach Co., 241 N.C. 389, 85 S.E. 2d 319.

Since plaintiff relies…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Jyachosky v. WensilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Sarah Etta Davis, Administratrix of the Estate of Earl Sinclair Davis, Deceased v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  3. Branch v. DempseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. James v. FrancescoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Sparrow v. GoodmanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API