Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1954No. 239PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Both the oral and physical testimony tend to show that the collision occurred within the intersection of South Washington Avenue and East Pearsall Street. Therefore it appears beyond peradventure that the two vehicles in fact reached the intersection at approximately the same time. No witness tendered by plaintiff testified that Hartley reached and entered the intersection at a time when Pope was a sufficient distance away to furnish reasonable grounds for him to assume, and that he did assume, that he could cross the intersection in safety, ahead of Pope’s vehicle, without creating an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Childress v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Farber v. SmolackNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Branch v. DempseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API