Legal Opinion

Branch v. Dempsey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1965No. 194PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

Upon a motion for judgment of nonsuit the evidence of the plaintiff, together with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, must be taken to be true and must be interpreted in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Coleman v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 259 N.C. 241, 130 S.E. 2d 338; Ammons v. Britt, 256 N.C. 248, 123 *740S.E. 2d 579. However, in order to survive such motion by Dempsey, the evidence, when so construed, must be sufficient to sustain the burden which rests upon the plaintiff of proving negligence by the defendant Dempsey and that such negligence was the proximate cause of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Rutherford v. Bass Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API